|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
Golf savings program
Golf Card International adds 12 Billy Casper Golf-managed facilities
to the company's nationwide roster that includes more than 3,600 courses.
Over the weekend,
Sonartec gained five new PGA players and had 16 fairway woods and
two driving irons in play at the Buick Open, ranking them in fifth place
for the overall number of fairway woods in play. AccuFLEX Golf
shafts were used to earn victories in the Lady and Senior divisions of
the fourth Pinnacle Golf/LDA Long Drive tour event of the season. Sharon
Sullivan won her third title of the series in the women's division and
Pat Dempsey took the Senior title using an AccuFLEX PRO LD shaft.
|
Commentary Last week, The Wire wrote a commentary commending the U.S. Golf Association for setting the same COR on drivers for all players, rather than allowing amateurs to play with a higher COR club through 2008. This week, we present a commentary critical of the way the USGA arrived at this decision. We think these two points of view give our readers some food for thought. What golf driver a person decides to buy and hit is really not an issue that requires discussion -- COR, SMORE, who cares what it is or why. Most people could use a frying pan to hit a ball 200 yards on a good day. Unfortunately, the bad days are the problem and the driver has nothing to do with it. Rather, the problem is a swing thing -- or the lack of one. Nevertheless, most golfers who have $500 burning a hole in their pockets want to try the latest club that will give them extra distance if the club is hit correctly. Our country was built on that philosophy, the freedom to spend as much as a person wants to try to obtain the ultimate, be it a 300-yard drive or something a bit more tangible. While not necessarily part of the Bill of Rights, the concept is part of every golfer in some way. What really is the problem is how this whole thing has played out and how by trying to save the game the U.S. Golf Association may have hurt it. The protection of length has been a laudable goal of the USGA and made sense until it decided to compromise. By issuing a proposed rule change and then asking for feedback, it was clear that the USGA finally understood that the rights of golfers and the goal of controlling length could both be addressed effectively in the proposed rule. What no one could foresee was that the USGA would completely pull back on the position of its proposed rule, citing, of all things, concerns of the Japanese manufacturers. The pulling back from the proposed rule created turmoil for some of the biggest companies within the golf industry. Relying on the word of the USGA, most manufacturers created drivers that exceed the current COR measurement to conform to the new proposed number that would, if you believe the marketing hype, allow for longer drives by the weekend golfer. New high-test clubs entered the distribution chain and the cash register started to ring in a slow economy for an industry that needs all the help it can get. Then came the slap in the face. The USGA decided not to stick with its proposed rule and reverted back to its original position, dragging a kicking and screaming Royal and Ancient Golf Club with it. Now the clubs that are on retailers' shelves, in the weekender's bag and advertised in every golf magazine for August and September are not legal. Can the golf industry afford to spend millions in Research and Development, production, marketing and distribution on a product that has no shelf life in the U.S. and is tainted in all the other countries in the world? Does the waste of money and time really help golf or put it on the fast track of the airline and other industries that have wacky rules and even wackier organizations trying to control them, eventually bankrupting them? Golf did not take a giant step last week, it just fell to one knee.
| ||||||